Commentaries
...
No one knew (ουδεις εγνω). Second aorist active indicative of γινωσκω. The disciples had not yet perceived the treacherous heart o…
Albert Barnes
AlbertBarnes
No man at the table knew. This shows that Jesus had signified to John only who it was that would betray him.
The bag
Charles Ellicott
CharlesEllicott
Now no man at the table knew.—This is a comment of the Apostle's, as he writes in remembrance of the impression made at the time upon all …
Church Fathers
ChurchFathers
St. John Chrysostom: After His twofold promise of assistance to the Apostles in their future labors, our Lord remembered that …
Expositor's Bible Commentary
Expositor'sBible Commentary
(27a) “Satan entered into him.” This moment was Judas’s last opportunity to renounce his treachery. If the other disciples were ignorant of Judas’s…
John Calvin
JohnCalvin
Not one of those who were at table. Either John had not yet related to others what Christ had told him, or they were so much struck by it,…
John Gill
JohnGill
Now no man at the table Not one of those who lay upon the couches at the table, excepting John, to whom the signal was gi…
Matthew Henry
MatthewHenry
Our Lord had often spoken of his own sufferings and death without such trouble of spirit as he now showed when he spoke of Judas. The sins of Chris…
Thomas Aquinas
ThomasAquinas
-
We now see the betrayal itself, after it was predicted.
First, we see that Judas was allowed to do what was predicted; and second,…
Sermons
Loading sermons...
Catechisms
Loading catechisms...
Confessions
Loading confessions...
Devotionals
Loading devotionals...
A.T. Robertson
A.T.Robertson