Albert Barnes Commentary


Albert Barnes Commentary
"What will ye? shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of gentleness?" — 1 Corinthians 4:21 (ASV)
What will ye? It depends on yourselves how I will come. If you lay aside your contentions and strife; if you administer discipline as you should; if you give yourselves heartily and entirely to the work of the Lord, I will come, not to reprove or to punish, but as a father and a friend. But if you do not heed my exhortations, or the labours of Timothy; if you still continue your contentions, and do not remove the occasions of offence, I will come with severity and the language of rebuke.
With a rod. To correct and punish.
In the spirit of meekness. Comforting and commending, instead of chastising. Paul intimates that this depended on themselves. They had the power, and it was their duty to administer discipline; but if they would not do it, the task would devolve on him as the founder and father of the church, and as entrusted with power by the Lord Jesus, to administer the severity of Christian discipline, or to punish those who offended by bodily suffering. See 1 Corinthians 5:6; 11:30. See also the case of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1 and following), and of Elymas the sorcerer (Acts 13:10–11).
"You," "imitators," "will I come" (2 Corinthians 13:10).
REMARKS ON 1 Corinthians Chapter 4
The hidden things of darkness will be brought out—all the secret crimes, plans, and purposes of men will be developed. All that has been done in secret, in darkness, in the night, in palaces and in prisons, will be developed.
What a development will take place in the great day when the secret crimes of a world will be revealed, and when all that has now escaped the notice of men, and the punishment of courts, will be brought out!
Every man's secret thoughts will be revealed. There will be no concealment then. All that we have devised or desired, all the thoughts that we have forgotten, will there be brought out to noonday. How will the sinner tremble when all his thoughts are made known!
Suppose, unknown to him, some person had been writing down all that a man has thought for a day, a week, or a year, and should begin to read it to him. Who is there that would not hang his head with shame, and tremble at such a record? Yet at the day of judgment the thoughts of the whole life will be revealed.
Every man will be judged as he ought to be. God is impartial. The man that ought to be saved, will be; the man that ought not, will not be.
How solemn will be the impartial trial of the world! Who can think of it but with alarm!
We have an argument here for the truth of the Christian religion. The argument is founded on the fact that the apostles were willing to suffer so much in order to establish it. They professed to have been eye-witnesses of what they affirmed. They had nothing to gain by spreading it, if it was not true. They exposed themselves to persecution on this account, and became willing to die rather than deny its truth. Take, for example, the case of the apostle Paul.
He had every prospect of honour and of wealth in his own country. He had been liberally educated, and had the confidence of his countrymen. He might have risen to the highest station of trust or influence. He had talents which would have raised him to distinction anywhere.
He could not have been mistaken in regard to the events connected with his conversion (Acts 9). The scene, the voice, the light, the blindness, were all things which could not have been counterfeited. They were open and public. They did not occur "in a corner."
He had no earthly motive to change his course. Christianity was despised when he embraced it; its friends were few and poor; and it had no prospect of spreading through the world. It conferred no wealth; bestowed no diadem; imparted no honours; gave no ease; conducted to no friendship of the great and the mighty. It subjected its friends to persecution, tears, trials, and death.
What should induce such a man to make such a change? Why should Paul have embraced this, but from a conviction of its truth? How could he be convinced of that truth except by some argument that should be so strong as to overcome his hatred to it, make him willing to renounce all his prospects for it—to encounter all that the world could heap upon him, and even death itself, rather than deny it? But such a religion had a higher than any earthly origin, and must have been from God.