Albert Barnes Commentary 1 Thessalonians 2:5

Albert Barnes Commentary

1 Thessalonians 2:5

1798–1870
Presbyterian
Albert Barnes
Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes Commentary

1 Thessalonians 2:5

1798–1870
Presbyterian
SCRIPTURE

"For neither at any time were we found using words of flattery, as ye know, nor a cloak of covetousness, God is witness;" — 1 Thessalonians 2:5 (ASV)

For neither at any time used we flattering words.

The word here rendered "flattering"—kolakeia—occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. The meaning is that the apostle did not deal in the language of adulation; he did not praise them for their beauty, wealth, talent, or accomplishments, and conceal from them the painful truths about their guilt and danger.

He stated simple truth—not refusing to commend men if truth would allow it, and never hesitating to declare his honest convictions about their guilt and danger. One of the principal arts of the deceiver on all subjects is flattery, and Paul says that when preaching to the Thessalonians he had carefully avoided it. He now appeals to that fact as a proof of his own integrity. They knew that he had been faithful to their souls.

Nor a cloke of covetousness. The word rendered "cloke" here—profasis—means, properly, "what is shown or appears before anyone;" that is, show, pretence, pretext, put forth in order to cover one's real intent (Matthew 23:14; Mark 12:40; Luke 20:47).

The meaning here is that he did not put on a pretence or appearance of piety for the sake of promoting the schemes of covetousness. The evidence of that was not only what they observed of the general spirit of the apostle, but also the fact that when with them he had actually laboured with his own hands for a support (1 Thessalonians 2:9). It is obvious that there were those there, as there sometimes are now, who, under the pretence of great zeal for religion, were really seeking wealth. And it is possible that it may have been alleged against Paul and his fellow-labourers that they were such persons.

God is witness. This is a solemn appeal to God for the truth of what he had said. He refers not only to their own observation, but he calls God himself to witness his sincerity. God knew the truth in the case. There could have been no imposing on him; and the appeal, therefore, is to one who was intimately acquainted with the truth.

From this, we learn:

  1. that it is right, on important occasions, to appeal to God for the truth of what we say.
  2. We should always so live that we can properly make such an appeal to him.