Albert Barnes Commentary Job 42:7

"And it was so, that, after Jehovah had spoken these words unto Job, Jehovah said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends; for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath." — Job 42:7 (ASV)

And it was so, that after the Lord had spoken these words to Job — Had the matter been left according to the record in Job 42:6, a wholly erroneous impression would have been made. Job was overwhelmed with the conviction of his guilt, and had nothing been said to his friends, the impression would have been that he was wholly in the wrong. It was important, therefore, and was indeed essential to the plan of the book, that the divine judgment should be pronounced on the conduct of his three friends.

The Lord said to Eliphaz the Temanite — Eliphaz had been uniformly first in the argument with Job, and hence, he is particularly addressed here. He seems to have been the most aged and respectable of the three friends, and in fact, the speeches of the others are often a mere echo of his.

My wrath is kindled — Wrath, or anger, is often represented as kindled, or burning.

For you have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job has — This must be understood comparatively. God did not approve of all that Job had said, but the meaning is, that his general views of His government were just. The main position which he had defended in contrast to his friends was correct, for his arguments tended to vindicate the divine character, and to uphold the divine government.

It is to be remembered, also, as Bouiller has remarked, that there was a great difference in the circumstances of Job and the three friends—circumstances modifying the degrees of blameworthiness chargeable to each. Job indeed uttered some improper sentiments about God and His government; he expressed himself with irreverence and impatience; he used language of boldness and complaint that was wholly improper, but this was done in the agony of mental and bodily suffering, and when provoked by the severe and improper charges of hypocrisy brought by his friends.

What they said, on the contrary, was unprovoked. It was when they were free from suffering, and when they were urged to it by no severity of trial. It was, moreover, when every consideration required them to express the language of condolence and to comfort a suffering friend.