Charles Ellicott Commentary 1 Corinthians 6:13

"Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall bring to nought both it and them. But the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body:" — 1 Corinthians 6:13 (ASV)

Meats for the belly. The Apostle now proceeds to show that the question of eating meats offered to idols does come into the category of indifferent things on which exercising Christian freedom is permissible, and that the question of fornication does not. Lawful matters are to be decided by the highest principle of expediency; but fornication is an unlawful matter, and therefore the question of its expediency does not arise at all.

The stomach is adapted to the digestion of food, and food is adapted to it. This is, however, only for this life; both will be destroyed by death.

But the person (where “body” is equivalent to “us” in 1 Corinthians 6:14) of the man is enduring. No food that enters defiles the man. Fornication is not a mere transitory gratification; it affects the man.

The use of the stomach is to receive and digest food, and only the animal organization is affected by that. It cannot be said that the man is made for fornication. The person of each is made for the Lord; the whole Church is His body; each baptized person is a limb of that body; and the Lord is for the body.

He came to earth and died for it, and for each member of it; therefore, what affects that body, or any member of that body (i.e., any Christian), cannot be an indifferent matter. Neither will the man perish, as meats and the belly will; he is immortal (see 1 Corinthians 15:51–52).

This seems to be the argument by which St. Paul maintains liberty to be right regarding meats and shows that the same principle does not apply to sensual indulgence. It may be put argumentatively as follows:

1. Eating meats offered to idols is an “indifferent matter,” because:
   • Meats only affect the particular organ designed for them;
   • Meats and that organ will perish together.
2. Fornication is not an “indifferent matter,” because:
   • It affects the man, and he is not designed for the purpose of this indulgence;
   • The man is immortal, and therefore the moral effect of the fornication on his nature does not perish at his death.

Conclusion. Only indifferent matters are to be the subject of Christian liberty, and the decision must be according to the utility of each act. Fornication is not an indifferent matter; therefore, it is not to be decided upon in that way.