Charles Ellicott Commentary Daniel 9:26

"And after the threescore and two weeks shall the anointed one be cut off, and shall have nothing: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined." — Daniel 9:26 (ASV)

After sixty-two weeks.— These words can only mean that in the seventieth week the Anointed One will be cut off. Observe the care with which the seventy weeks are arranged in a series of the form 7 + 62 + 1. During the period of seven weeks Jerusalem is to be rebuilt. The “troublous times” are not to be restricted to this period, but may apply to the sixty-two weeks that follow. After the end of the sixty-nine weeks Messiah is to be cut off. By “Messiah” we must understand the same person who is spoken of in Daniel 9:25.

It should also be observed that the word “prince,” which is applied to Messiah in Daniel 9:25, is here used of another person—some secular prince, who stands in opposition to the Messiah. The Greek versions render “unction” instead of “anointed,” from which Jacob of Edessa explains “the cutting off” to mean “the cessation of the unction by which judgment and sovereignty were established.” The word “to cut off,” however, applies to a person more appropriately than to a thing. It is frequently used of excommunication, for example, Exodus 30:33; Exodus 30:38, Psalms 37:9, and must not be mistaken for the word “to cut off” (Isaiah 53:8).

But not for himself.— On the marginal rendering compare John 14:30. Literally the words mean, and He has not, but what it is that He loses is left indefinite. Taking the sense according to the context, the meaning is either that He no longer has a people, or that His office of Messiah among His people ceases.

That shall come.— These words imply coming with hostile intent, as in Daniel 1:1; Daniel 11:10. Two such princes have been already mentioned (Daniel 7:23 and following, Daniel 8:23 and following), one being Antiochus, the other his great antitype, namely, Antichrist. Are we to identify this “prince” with either of these? Apparently not. Another typical prince is here introduced to our notice, who will destroy the city and the sanctuary after the “cutting off” or rejection of the Messiah. But it must be noticed that the work of destruction is here attributed to the “people,” and not to the “prince.”

The end of it.— It is not clear what end or whose end is signified. According to grammatical rules, the possessive pronoun may either refer to “sanctuary,” the last substantive, or to “prince,” the chief nominative in the sentence. The use of the word “flood” (Daniel 11:22) (compare “overflow,”Daniel 11:26) makes it, at first sight, more plausible to think of the end of a person than of a thing. (Compare also Nahum 1:8.) But on comparing this clause with the following, it appears that by “the end” is meant the whole issue of the invasion. This is stated to be desolation, such as is caused by a deluge.

Until the end.— That is, until the end of the seventy weeks, desolations are decreed. The words recall Isaiah 10:22-23.