Charles Ellicott Commentary Isaiah 20

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Isaiah 20

1819–1905
Anglican
Charles Ellicott
Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Isaiah 20

1819–1905
Anglican
Verse 1

"In the year that Tartan came unto Ashdod, when Sargon the king of Assyria sent him, and he fought against Ashdod and took it;" — Isaiah 20:1 (ASV)

In the year that Tartan came to Ashdod. —Better, the Tartan. The word was an official title borne by the generalissimo of the Assyrian armies, who was next in authority to the king. He may, or may not, have been the same as the officer of the same rank who appears in 2 Kings 18:17 as sent by Sennacherib to Jerusalem.

When Sargon the king of Assyria sent him. —Much light has been thrown by the Assyrian inscriptions on the events connected with this king. Before that discovery, no trace of his name was found other than in this passage, and his very existence had been questioned. As it is, he comes before us as one of the greatest Assyrian monarchs. He succeeded Shalmaneser VI, the conqueror of Israel, in 721 B.C., at first as guardian and co-regent of his son Samdan-Malik, and afterwards in his own name. His reign lasted until 704 B.C., when he was succeeded by Sennacherib. Long inscriptions, giving the annals of his reign, were found by M. Botta at Khorsabad, and have been interpreted by M. Oppert (Records of the Past, vii. 21, 9:1, 11:17, 27, 33) and others.

And fought against Ashdod. —The occasion of the campaign is related by Sargon in the annals just mentioned as happening in his eleventh year. Azuri, the king of Ashdod, refused to pay tribute, and revolted. Sargon deposed him, and placed his brother Akhismit on the throne. The people, in their turn, rose against Akhismit, and chose Yaman as their king. Sargon then marched against the city, took it, and carried off its gods and its treasures as booty (Records of the Past, vii. 40). These events naturally excited the minds of Hezekiah and his counselors, and led them to look to an alliance with Egypt as their best protection.

Verse 2

"at that time Jehovah spake by Isaiah the son of Amoz, saying, Go, and loose the sackcloth from off thy loins, and put thy shoe from off thy foot. And he did so, walking naked and barefoot." — Isaiah 20:2 (ASV)

Go and loose the sackcloth from off thy loins. —Against these schemes Isaiah was prompted to prophesy in act as well as words. Month by month, for three whole years, he was seen in the streets of Jerusalem as one who was already as a prisoner of war, ready to be led into an ignominious exile.

The “sackcloth” was the “rough garment” which, like Elijah (2 Kings 1:8) and John the Baptist, the prophets habitually wore (Zechariah 13:4), and the “nakedness was confined to the laying aside this outer robe, and appearing in the short tunic worn near the body (1 Samuel 19:24; 2 Samuel 6:14–20; John 21:7). Like instances of prophetic symbolism are the horns of Zedekiah in 1 Kings 22:11, the yokes worn by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 27:2), Ezekiel’s lying on his side (Ezekiel 4:4), and the girdle with which Agabus bound himself (Acts 21:11).

Verse 3

"And Jehovah said, Like as my servant Isaiah hath walked naked and barefoot three years for a sign and a wonder concerning Egypt and concerning Ethiopia;" — Isaiah 20:3 (ASV)

For a sign and wonder upon Egypt and upon Ethiopia. —Apparently Isaiah prophesied in act, but in silence, and did not unfold the meaning of the symbol till the three years came to an end. There are no adequate grounds for limiting his dramatic action to a single day or three days. Egypt and Ethiopia are, as in Isaiah 18; Isaiah 19, closely connected, both countries being under a king of Ethiopian origin, Sabaco.

Verse 4

"so shall the king of Assyria lead away the captives of Egypt, and the exiles of Ethiopia, young and old, naked and barefoot, and with buttocks uncovered, to the shame of Egypt." — Isaiah 20:4 (ASV)

So shall the king of Assyria lead away the Egyptians ... — This prediction was not fulfilled in the reign of either Sargon or Sennacherib. Instead, Esarhaddon subdued the whole of Egypt, carried off its treasures, and appointed satraps over its provinces (Budge’s Esarhaddon, pp. 111-129).

The prophet paints a vivid picture of the brutality with which prisoners were treated during a march. What would people say about their boasted policy of an Egypto-Cushite alliance when they saw it result in such a disaster?

It may be noted that Rabshakeh’s scornful phrase, This bruised reed, seems to imply that Assyria no longer feared the power of Egypt. Furthermore, Nahum (Nahum 3:8) speaks of No (that is, No-Amun or Thebes) as having been conquered and its people carried into captivity by the time he wrote.

Verse 6

"And the inhabitant of this coast-land shall say in that day, Behold, such is our expectation, whither we fled for help to be delivered from the king of Assyria: and we, how shall we escape?" — Isaiah 20:6 (ASV)

The inhabitant of this isle ... — Better, as elsewhere, coast-land. Here it probably refers to the whole coast of Philistia, which had been foremost in the revolt, and Phoenicia, Tyre also having joined in it (Annals of Sargon in Lenormant’s Anc. Hist., i. 396). Cyprus, the conquest of which Sargon records (Records of the Past, vii. 51), may also be included. The whole sea-board population would find out too late that they could not resist Assyria even with the help of Egypt and Ethiopia.

Jump to: