Charles Ellicott Commentary Jeremiah 32:12

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Jeremiah 32:12

1819–1905
Anglican
Charles Ellicott
Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Jeremiah 32:12

1819–1905
Anglican
SCRIPTURE

"and I delivered the deed of the purchase unto Baruch the son of Neriah, the son of Mahseiah, in the presence of Hanamel mine uncle`s [son], and in the presence of the witnesses that subscribed the deed of the purchase, before all the Jews that sat in the court of the guard." — Jeremiah 32:12 (ASV)

Baruch the son of Neriah, the son of Maaseiah. — This is the first mention of a man who played a more or less prominent part in connection with Jeremiah’s later work. Nothing is known of his father or grandfather, but the fact that both are named indicates that he belonged to the nobler families of Judah. This is confirmed, partly by the fact that his brother Seraiah (Jeremiah 51:59, see the note on this verse) held a high position in the court of Zedekiah, and partly by Josephus, who describes him as of “a very illustrious house,” and “highly educated” (Ant. 10.6, § 12).

The mention of Chelcias (the Greek form for Hilkiah) among his ancestors, in the apocryphal book that bears his name , may indicate a connection with the family of the high priest in the reign of Josiah (2 Kings 22:4–14). We may find in this fact an explanation of his regard for Jeremiah.

In relation to the prophet, he appears in Jeremiah 36:4 as acting as his secretary, as accused of instigating Jeremiah to preach submission to the Chaldeans (Jeremiah 43:3), as sharing his sufferings and dangers (Jeremiah 36:26), and, according to Josephus (as cited above), as thrown into prison with him. He was probably an influential member of the Chaldean party in the court of Judah, protesting against the policy that courted an alliance with Egypt and entered into intrigues and schemes of rebellion against the power of Babylon.

The book that bears his name is probably pseudonymous, but it bears witness, by the very fact of its being ascribed to him, to the importance of the position that he occupied in the politics of the time. Here he is present as at least visiting the prophet in prison, even if he did not share his imprisonment, and Jeremiah hands over the deeds of conveyance to his custody.

Before all the Jews that sat in the court of the prison. — The incidental mention of these is interesting, as showing the freedom of access that was permitted to the prisoner. Looking to the freedom and fullness of the prayer that follows (Jeremiah 32:17–25), it is a legitimate inference that they formed, as it were, a congregation of disciples, on whom the prophet sought to impress, by the transaction of the purchase, his own sure and certain hope of the restoration of his people.