Charles Ellicott Commentary John 9:7

"and said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam (which is by interpretation, Sent). He went away therefore, and washed, and came seeing." — John 9:7 (ASV)

Go, wash in the pool of Siloam.—Compare Notes on John 5:2 (“Bethesda”), and on Luke 13:4 (“the tower in Siloam”). The locality is almost certainly the place now known by the Arabic form of the same name, the Birket Silwân, which is in the lower Tyropoeon valley, between the Temple mountain and Mount Zion.

It is about a quarter of a mile from the present city wall, but in the time of our Lord, the wall extended up to it (Josephus, Wars, Book 5, Chapter 4, Section 1; so the Antonine Itinerary in the fourth century). The place is frequently mentioned by Josephus, and there is every reason to believe that in the present pool we have the Siloah of Nehemiah 3:15, the Shiloah of Isaiah 8:6, and the Siloam of the present passage. The form of the word here used by John is that found in the Greek translation of both the Old Testament passages.

The words “wash in” literally mean, wash into; that is, “wash so that the clay from the eyes will pass into the tank.”

The attempt to show that the waters of Siloam were also an ordinary remedial agent must be abandoned, at least concerning blindness. The command recalls the one given to Naaman the Syrian (2 Kings 5:10), and it probably recalled it to the blind man’s mind.

In any case, it is a further stage in his spiritual education. It is a demand on the faith that realizes the presence of the Power to heal. The place was chosen, perhaps, as a well-known spot, or as one at some little distance, so as to afford time for reflection and a test for obedience.

It may be, however, that there is another reason for the choice. The pool of Siloam was bound up with all the religious feelings of the Feast of Tabernacles. A solemn procession went each morning to it and carried water from it to the Temple. That water had already led to the teaching of the gift of the Spirit to every person who would receive the Messiah (see Notes on John 7:37 and following), uttered, perhaps, on this very day . A sacred significance would then be attached to the pool of Siloam that would in itself be a help to faith.

Which is by interpretation, Sent.—John sees a significance even in the name. The sending of the waters of this intermittent spring had given it the name Siloam. Popular belief connected the moving of the waters with the presence of an angel who gave them their healing virtue. There was One then present who was the source of all life and power to heal, and He was Himself the Sent of God.

So He had taught men in words that had fixed themselves on John’s mind (John 3:17; John 3:34; John 5:36; John 5:38; John 7:29; John 8:42). So the prophet Isaiah had spoken of His work (Isaiah 61:1), and He had quoted that prophecy of His own work with the remarkable addition from the LXX., and recovering of sight to the blind. (Compare Notes on Matthew 11:5, Luke 4:18). So He was later called the Apostle (the One sent) of our profession (Hebrews 3:1).

And came seeing.—These words need no Note for the reader who will pause to think of them, but we often pass over them without remembering that a whole world of visual objects now first burst upon the mind of him who was healed. We can only know in part what a revelation this was, but we may by thought realize it in some degree. There is no reference to his coming again to our Lord. He apparently returned to his usual dwelling, and this agrees with the mention of “neighbours” in the following verse.