Charles Ellicott Commentary Leviticus 11:4

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Leviticus 11:4

1819–1905
Anglican
Charles Ellicott
Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott Commentary

Leviticus 11:4

1819–1905
Anglican
SCRIPTURE

"Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that part the hoof: the camel, because he cheweth the cud but parteth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you." — Leviticus 11:4 (ASV)

Nevertheless these shall ye not eat. —As there are some quadrupeds which comply with only one of the two above-named conditions— i.e., which ruminate but do not have their hooves perfectly parted in two, or, vice versa, are cloven-hoofed and not ruminant—it is declared here that such animals must not be eaten.

As the camel, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not ... Better, though he cheweth the cud, yet he divideth not, as the same phrase is properly rendered in the Authorized Version in Leviticus 11:7. The first animal cited to illustrate this fact is the indispensable camel, or “the ship of the desert,” as it is aptly called. Though cloven-footed above, the toes of the camel are united below in a large elastic pad on which the camel treads, and which is like the sole of a shoe. Hence it does not come within the category of those animals which are thoroughly cloven-hoofed. The Egyptians, the Zebii, and the Hindus, too, did not eat camel’s flesh, because they supposed it to be heating, and to produce cruelty and revenge; while the Persians, the ancient Arabians, and the Moslems feasted upon its milk and flesh.