Charles Ellicott Commentary Zechariah 6:11

"yea, take [of them] silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest;" — Zechariah 6:11 (ASV)

Then take. —Better, yes, take: namely, from the three mentioned above.

Crowns. —Better, a composite crown, since the word is construed with a singular verb in Zechariah 6:14, and though plural in form it seems to be used of a single crown or fillet in Job 31:36. Zechariah is commanded to go to the house of Josiah son of Zephaniah, who was entertaining certain Jews who seem to have come from Babylon with gifts and offerings for the House of the Lord.

From these men he was to take gold and silver, and to cause a composite diadem to be made from them, with which he was to crown Joshua the high priest. We cannot, of course, venture with Ewald to insert the words “and upon the head of Zerubbabel” after the words “upon the head of Joshua”; and to insert the name “Joshua” in the clause “and will be a priest upon his throne.” Even if such an arbitrary alteration of the text were admissible, it would be most inappropriate.

No crown was placed on Zerubbabel, for such an act would have been a seeming restoration of the kingdom when it was not to be restored. God had foretold that none of the race of Jehoiakim should prosper, “sitting on the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah” (Jeremiah 22:30). Moreover, the crown had been definitively taken away in the time of Zedekiah, “until he come whose right is” (Ezekiel 21:27, see also verse 32): namely, the “king who should reign in righteousness” (Isaiah 32:1), “and prosper,” a Branch of righteousness (Jeremiah 23:5).

But there was placed upon the head of Joshua, the high priest, this “royal” (2 Samuel 12:30) crown—for the high priest did not properly wear a crown, and this word is never used for “mitre”—that in his person might be symbolized the twofold office of the Messiah, who, like Melchizedek, was to be a priest and king (Psalms 110:0). That the high priests during a succeeding period were practically the rulers of the nation is not sufficient to account for the terms of this prophecy, especially for the emphatic personality of the royal priest mentioned in the next verses.