Expositor's Bible Commentary Commentary


Expositor's Bible Commentary Commentary
"And it came to pass, when he went into the house of one of the rulers of the Pharisees on a sabbath to eat bread, that they were watching him." — Luke 14:1 (ASV)
Since this is the fourth time Luke records a controversy over the Sabbath (v.1), it is obvious that this was a major issue between Jesus and the religious leaders (cf. 6:1–5, 6:11; 13:10–17). The host was one of the “ruling” Pharisees, possibly a member of the Sanhedrin. Luke pictures the Pharisees as watchdogs of the faith as they waited for some theological flaw to appear in Jesus’ teaching (vv.1–3; cf. 5:17; 6:7). The man who enters the scene was possibly planted there to test Jesus. “Dropsy” (see ZPEB, 2:134) may have popularly been considered a curse for sin (Numbers 5:11–27). As in 6:9, Jesus took the initiative with a question designed to shift the burden of proof to the opposition (v.3). During the silence of the “Pharisees and experts in the law,” Jesus met the man’s need. His condition could have waited another day, but Jesus was concerned to establish a principle. This may be why he dismissed the man without including him further in the conversation.