John Calvin Commentary


John Calvin Commentary
"The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, he who is blessed for evermore knoweth that I lie not." — 2 Corinthians 11:31 (ASV)
The God and Father As he was about to relate a singular feat, which, at the same time, was not well known, he confirms it by making use of an oath. Observe, however, what is the form of a pious oath — when, for the purpose of declaring the truth, we reverently call God as our witness.
Now this persecution was, as it were, Paul’s first apprenticeship, as appears from Luke (Acts 9:23–25). But if, while yet a raw recruit, he was tested in such beginnings, what shall we think of him when a veteran soldier? As, however, flight gives no evidence of a valiant spirit, it may be asked why he makes mention of his flight.
I answer that the gates of the royal city having been closed clearly showed with what rage the wicked were inflamed against him. It was on no light grounds that they had been led to entertain such a feeling, for if Paul had not fought for Christ with new and unusual activity, the wicked would never have been thrown into such a commotion. His singular perseverance, however, shone forth chiefly in this — that, after escaping from so severe a persecution, he did not cease to stir up the whole world against him by prosecuting fearlessly the Lord’s work.
It may be, however, that he proceeds to mock those ambitious men who, while they had never had experience of anything but applauses, favors, honorable salutations, and agreeable lodgings, wished to be held in the highest esteem. For, in opposition to this, he relates that he was shut in, so that he could with difficulty save his life by a miserable and ignominious flight.
Some, however, ask whether it was lawful for Paul to leap over the walls, since it was a capital crime to do so. I answer, in the first place, that it is not certain whether that punishment was sanctioned by law in the East. Further, even if it was so, Paul nevertheless was guilty of no crime, because he did not do this as an enemy or for sport, but from necessity.
For the law would not punish a man who would throw himself down from the walls to save his life from the flames; and what difference is there between a fire and a fierce attack from robbers? We must always, in connection with laws, consider reason and equity. This consideration will exempt Paul entirely from blame.