John Calvin Commentary


John Calvin Commentary
"Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord will render to him according to his works:" — 2 Timothy 4:14 (ASV)
Alexander the coppersmith. In this man was exhibited a shocking instance of apostasy. He had made a profession of some zeal in advancing the reign of Christ, against which he afterward carried on open war. No class of enemies is more dangerous or more venomous than this. But from the beginning, the Lord determined that His Church should not be exempt from this evil, so that our courage would not fail when we are tried by any of the same kind.
Hath done me many evil things. It is proper to observe what are the “many evils” that Paul complains Alexander brought upon him. They consisted in this: that he opposed his doctrine. Alexander was a craftsman, not prepared by the learning of the schools for being a great disputer; but domestic enemies have always been abundantly able to do injury. And the wickedness of such men always gains credit in the world, so that malicious and impudent ignorance sometimes creates trouble and difficulty greater than the highest abilities accompanied by learning. Besides, when the Lord brings His servants into contest with persons of this low and base class, He purposely withdraws them from the view of the world, so that they may not indulge in ostentatious display.
From Paul’s words (verse 15), for he vehemently opposed our discourses, we may infer that he had committed no greater offense than an attack on sound doctrine. For if Alexander had wounded his person, or committed an assault on him, he would have endured it patiently; but when the truth of God is attacked, his holy heart burns with indignation, because in all the members of Christ that saying must hold good:
The zeal of thy house hath eaten me up (Psalms 69:9).
And this is also the reason for the stern imprecation into which he bursts out, that the Lord may reward him according to his works. A little afterward, when he complains that all had forsaken him (Psalms 69:9), still he does not call down the vengeance of God on them, but, on the contrary, appears as their intercessor, pleading that they may obtain pardon. So mild and so merciful to all others, how is it that he shows himself so harsh and inexorable toward this individual? The reason is this: because some had fallen through fear and weakness, he desires that the Lord would forgive them, for in this manner we ought to have compassion on the weakness of brothers. But because this man rose against God with malice and sacrilegious audacity, and openly attacked known truth, such impiety had no claim to compassion.
We must not imagine, therefore, that Paul was moved by excessive warmth of temper when he burst out into this imprecation; for it was from the Spirit of God, and through a well-regulated zeal, that he wished eternal perdition to Alexander, and mercy to the others. Since it is by the guidance of the Spirit that Paul pronounces a heavenly judgment from on high, we may infer from this passage how dear His truth is to God, for attacking which He punishes so severely. Especially, it ought to be observed how detestable a crime it is to fight with deliberate malice against the true religion.
But so that no one, by falsely imitating the Apostle, may rashly utter similar imprecations, there are three things here that deserve notice:
Ye know not of what spirit ye are (Luke 9:55).
They thought that they had Elijah as their supporter (2 Kings 1:10), who prayed to the Lord in the same manner; but because they differed widely from the spirit of Elijah, the imitation was absurd. It is therefore necessary that the Lord should reveal His judgment before we burst forth into such imprecations, and we should wish that by His Spirit He would restrain and guide our zeal. And whenever we call to our remembrance the vehemence of Paul against a single individual, let us also recollect his amazing meekness toward those who had so basely forsaken him, so that we may learn by his example to have compassion on the weakness of our brothers.
Here I wish to put a question to those who pretend that Peter presided over the church at Rome. Where was he at that time? According to their opinion, he was not dead, for they tell us that exactly a year intervened between his death and that of Paul. Besides, they extend his pontificate to seven years. Here Paul mentions his first defense; his second appearance before the court would not be quite so soon. So that Peter may not lose the title of Pope, must he endure being charged with the guilt of so shameful a revolt? Certainly, when the whole matter has been duly examined, we will find that everything that has been believed about his Popedom is fabulous.