John Calvin Commentary


John Calvin Commentary
"And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness a small round thing, small as the hoar-frost on the ground." — Exodus 16:14 (ASV)
And when the dew that lay was gone up. The shape of the manna is here briefly described, namely, that it was like the dew condensed into small round grains. Its taste will also be mentioned elsewhere. But here it was sufficient to show that this provision was not natural, but miraculously given to the clouds, so that they should daily rain manna.
For as for the idle talk of certain irreverent people,176 who claim that manna falls naturally in some countries—attempting in this way to display their own cleverness, as if they had convicted Moses of falsehood because he greatly praises what they consider an insignificant matter—it is all an absurdity that can be easily refuted.
It is indeed true that in certain parts of the world they collect white grains, to which the name of manna has been commonly given (and which177 one of the Rabbis asserts is Arabic); however, this substance is neither a food, nor does it drop daily from the clouds, nor has it anything in common with this food, which the Prophet properly dignifies with the title of “angels’ food,” because God, who opens the earth to provide ordinary food for humanity, at that time made provision for the nourishment of His people from heaven.
And so that it may appear beyond a doubt that this food was then created miraculously and contrary to the order of nature, these points are to be taken into consideration:
Let these points be carefully considered, and the miracle will be more than sufficiently evident, and will disperse all the clouds of objection by its intrinsic brightness.
176 “And even now in all that place this manna comes down in rain, according to what Moses then obtained of God, to send it the people for their sustenance.” — Josephus. Antiq., 3: 1. 6. Burekhardt identifies it with a substance called manna, obtained still by the Arabs from the ., 3: 1. 6. Burekhardt identifies it with a substance called manna, obtained still by the Arabs from the tarfa or tamarisk; and Rosenmuller speaks of it as being obtained from various trees in different countries. We can well understand the name having been given to any substance, which in some respects resembled it; but there does not appear to be any real correspondence in those which the critics mention. or tamarisk; and Rosenmuller speaks of it as being obtained from various trees in different countries. We can well understand the name having been given to any substance, which in some respects resembled it; but there does not appear to be any real correspondence in those which the critics mention.
177 This is from S. M., who says that Aben-Ezra has affirmed man to be an Arabic noun. — ., who says that Aben-Ezra has affirmed man to be an Arabic noun. — W..