John Calvin Commentary


John Calvin Commentary
"And many peoples shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of Jehovah, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of Jehovah from Jerusalem." — Isaiah 2:3 (ASV)
And many people shall go. In the former verse, he had slightly noted the reason why Mount Zion would hold so high a rank: it was because all nations would flow to it, as if the rivers were overflowing from the great abundance of waters. He now makes the same statement and assigns the reason, for it might be asked why various nations flocked to it in crowds from distant lands. He says, therefore, that the desire of serving God was their motive.
The word רבים (rabbim), many, implies a contrast. It means that there will not be, as formerly, only one nation which devotes itself to the worship of the true God. Instead, those who formerly were strangers and foreigners (Ephesians 2:19) will come into the same agreement with them about religion. It is as if he had said that the Church, which had formerly been, as it were, shut up in a corner, would now be gathered from every quarter. By the word many, he meant various, for unquestionably he did not intend to weaken the force of what he had said a little before about all nations.
Now, though it was never fulfilled that the nations of the whole world, each leaving their native country, made a journey into Judea, yet, because the doctrine of the gospel—by which God has gathered to Himself a Church indiscriminately out of all nations—proceeded from Mount Zion, he justly says that they will come to it who, having with one consent of faith embraced the covenant of eternal salvation, have been united into one Church. We must also observe the harmony between the figures of the law and that spiritual worship which began to be introduced at the coming of Christ.
And shall say, Come. By these words, he first declares that the godly will be filled with such an ardent desire to spread the doctrines of religion that everyone, not satisfied with his own calling and personal knowledge, will desire to draw others along with him. And indeed, nothing could be more inconsistent with the nature of faith than that deadness which would lead a person to disregard his brethren and to keep the light of knowledge choked up within his own breast. The greater the eminence above others that anyone has received from his calling, the more diligently he ought to labor to enlighten others.
This also points out to us the ordinary method of gathering a Church, which is by the outward voice of people. For though God might bring each person to Himself by a secret influence, yet He employs the agency of people, that He may awaken in them a concern for the salvation of each other. By this method, He likewise strengthens their mutual attachment and tests their willingness to receive instruction, when everyone permits himself to be taught by others.
Next, Isaiah shows that those who undertake the office of teaching and exhorting should not sit down and command others, but should join and walk along with them as companions. We see that some people are very severe instructors, eager to urge others forward, who yet do not move a step themselves. But here, believers, instead of giving their brethren the command, “Go up,” rather lead the way by their own example. This, therefore, is the true method of profitable teaching: when, by actually performing what we demand, we make it evident that we speak with sincerity and earnestness.
And he will teach us in his ways. He shows, first, that God cannot be worshipped rightly until we have been enlightened by doctrine, and secondly, that God is the only teacher of the Church, on whose lips we ought to hang. Hence it follows that nothing is less acceptable to God than certain foolish and erring services which people call devotion. Likewise, though He employs the agency of people in teaching, He still reserves this as His own right: that they must utter nothing but His word.
Had this rule been followed by those who called themselves teachers of the Church, religion would not have been so shamefully corrupted by a wide and confused diversity of superstitions. Nor is it possible that we will not be carried away into various errors when we are tossed about by the opinions of people.
Justly, therefore, does Isaiah, when he claims for God alone the power and authority to teach the Church, shut the mouths of all mortals, so that the office of teaching is committed to pastors for no other purpose than that God alone may be heard there. Let those who wish to be considered ministers of Christ allow themselves to be regulated by this statement, that they may take nothing away from His authority.
The Hebrew words ויורנו מדרכיו (veyorenu midderachaiv) may be literally rendered, he will teach us OF his ways; which means, “He will show us what His ways are,” or, “He will set before us His ways for perfect instruction.”
Next, he adds obedience: we will walk in his paths, by which he points out both the object and the result. For the instruction which is delivered to us from the mouth of the Lord is not mere speculation, but directs the course of our life and leads us to obey Him.
But we ought also to observe that the commandments of God are called ways and paths to inform us that those who turn aside from them in the smallest degree go miserably astray. Thus, every kind of unlawful liberty is restrained, and all people, from the least even to the greatest, are enjoined to observe this rule of obedience: that they keep themselves within the limits of the word of God.
For out of Zion shall go forth the law. This is an explanation of the former verse, in which he said that Mount Zion will be placed above all mountains; that is, that she will be raised to the highest pitch of honor when she shall become the fountain of saving doctrine, which shall flow out over the whole world.
He calls it the law. We have elsewhere spoken of the derivation and meaning of this word, for תורה (torah) means instruction, and the most complete of all kinds of instruction is contained in the law. He speaks, therefore, in the manner of the prophets. For since the rule of godliness was to be obtained from the law, they were accustomed, by a figure of speech (synecdoche), in which a part is taken for the whole, to include under the word law all the instruction which God has given, just as under the word altar they include the whole worship of God.
Now, since we know that this prediction was fulfilled when the preaching of the gospel began at that very place (for Christ first taught at Jerusalem, and afterwards His doctrine was spread throughout the whole world), we must not take the word “law” in a limited sense. For at that time, concerning its figures and bondage, it was rather abolished (Luke 2:46; Mark 16:10; Ezekiel 47:1; Luke 24:47).
Hence, we conclude that the term is applied, without limitation, to the word of God. And when the prophets say that waters will spring out of the temple to water the whole world (Ezekiel 47:1), they express metaphorically what Isaiah states in plain language: namely, that the source of saving doctrine will be from that place. For out of it, the apostles and other teachers spread the gospel through the whole world.
We must observe the reason why the Prophet made these statements. It was so that he might fortify the godly against various changes which, on many occasions, might otherwise have crushed their minds. Therefore, it was of great importance to provide against stumbling blocks and to fortify the minds of the godly. “Whatever may be the condition of your affairs, and though you should be oppressed by afflictions on all sides, still continue to cherish this assured hope, that the law will go forth out of Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem; for this is an infallible decree of God, which no diversity or change of events will make void.”
How much the godly needed this consolation may be easily inferred from the course of events which immediately followed. For when Judea had been forsaken, the temple destroyed, the worship of God overturned, and the fitting order of the Church utterly defaced while tyranny became more and more oppressive, it was natural that their minds should be discouraged and that all hope should be thrown away.
On the other hand, after the return of the Jews from Babylon, when dreadful superstitions gradually became prevalent, and the priests, instead of discharging their office in a lawful manner, grasped at wicked tyranny, what else could have occurred to the minds of the godly than that religion had fallen into neglect and that the worship of God was entirely laid aside, if they had not been supported by this promise?
For there can be no doubt that this temptation, which arose from internal vices, was more injurious than their banishment to Babylon. As long as they were exiles, they had at least prophets by whose instruction they were encouraged. But in that state of corruption, the good effect of instruction had been lost, and no regard was paid to religion or godliness. By the aid of this prediction alone, however, the Lord granted them the support they needed.
For why had the law, which God appeared to have consecrated for Himself in His own habitation, been thrown down and basely trampled under foot? Who, then, would have thought not only that it would have a place there, but that it would also reign in all foreign places and in the most distant regions?
On the other hand, the Prophet declares not only that the law will remain in its place but that it will travel further. By this, he means that it will not be confined within its former boundaries, for it will be proclaimed to the Gentiles without distinction.
And undoubtedly, this had very great authority and weight with the Apostles when they knew that they were appointed to perform those things which are promised here. Otherwise, they would never have had courage enough to venture to undertake the office and, in short, would not have been able to endure the burden, especially when the whole world furiously opposed them. But they knew that He by whom this had been promised, and from whom they had received authority to deliver this message, would easily remove every obstacle.
It ought also to be observed that we obtain from it a strong confirmation of our faith when we learn that the doctrine of the gospel came forth out of Zion. Because from this we conclude that it is not new, or recently sprung up, but that it is the eternal truth of God, to which testimony had been given in all ages before it was brought to light.
We also infer that it was necessary that all the ancient ceremonies should be abolished and that a new form of teaching should be introduced, though the substance of the doctrine continues to be the same. For the law formerly proceeded from Mount Sinai (Exodus 19:20), but now it proceeded out of Zion, and therefore it assumed a new form. Two things, therefore, must be observed:
The doctrine of God is the same and always agrees with itself, so that no one may charge God with inconsistency, as if He were inconsistent. And though the law of the Lord is now the same as it ever was, yet it came out of Zion with a new garment.
When ceremonies and shadows had been abolished, Christ was revealed, in whom their reality is perceived.