John Calvin Commentary


John Calvin Commentary
"Now this he said not of himself: but, being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for the nation;" — John 11:51 (ASV)
Now he spoke this, not of himself. When the Evangelist says that Caiaphas did not speak this of himself, he does not mean that Caiaphas—like one who was mad, or out of his senses—uttered what he did not understand; for he spoke what was his own opinion.
But the Evangelist means that a higher impulse guided his tongue, because God intended that he should make known, by his mouth, something higher than what occurred to his mind. Caiaphas, therefore, might be said, at that time, to have two tongues; for he vomited out the wicked and cruel design of putting Christ to death, which he had conceived in his mind; but God turned his tongue to a different purpose, so that, under ambiguous words, he likewise uttered a prediction.
God intended that the heavenly oracle should proceed from the high priest’s seat, that the Jews might have less excuse. For, though not one person in the whole assembly had his conscience moved, yet they afterwards perceived that their insensibility was not entitled to forgiveness. Nor did the wickedness of Caiaphas prevent his tongue from being the organ of the Holy Spirit, for God looked at the priesthood which he had instituted rather than at the person of the man.
And this was the reason which I alluded to, that a voice uttered from a lofty place might be more distinctly heard, and might have greater reverence and authority. In the same manner, God intended to bless his people by the mouth of Balaam, on whom he had bestowed the spirit of prophecy.
But it is highly ridiculous for the Papists to infer from this that we ought to regard as an oracle whatever the Roman high priest may think fit to pronounce.
But let that kind of obedience be far from us which drives us to horrid apostasy by denying the Son of God. With the same voice Caiaphas blasphemes and also prophesies. Those who follow his suggestion despise the prophecy and adopt the blasphemy. We ought to guard against the same thing happening to us if we listen to the Caiaphas of Rome; for otherwise the comparison would be defective.
Besides, I ask, must we conclude that, because Caiaphas once prophesied, every word uttered by the high priest is always a prophecy? But soon afterwards Caiaphas condemned as blasphemy (Matthew 26:65) the most important article of our faith. Hence we conclude that what the Evangelist now relates was an extraordinary occurrence, and that it would be foolish to cite it as an example.
That Jesus would die. First, the Evangelist shows that the whole of our salvation consists in this: that Christ should assemble us into one. For in this way he reconciles us to the Father, in whom is the fountain of life (Psalms 36:9).
Hence, we also infer that the human race is scattered and estranged from God until the children of God are assembled under Christ their Head.
Thus, the communion of saints is a preparation for eternal life, because all whom Christ does not gather to the Father remain in death, as we will see again in the seventeenth chapter.
For the same reason, Paul also teaches that Christ was sent for this purpose:
that he might gather together all things which are in heaven and in earth
(Ephesians 1:10).
Therefore, that we may enjoy the salvation brought by Christ, discord must be removed, and we must be made one with God and with angels, and among ourselves. The cause and pledge of this unity was the death of Christ, by which he drew all things to himself; but we are daily gathered by the Gospel into the fold of Christ.