John Gill Commentary Joshua 19

And the second lot came forth to Simeon
That is, the second of the seven lots, of which Benjamin's was the first; otherwise there were the two lots of Judah and Joseph, which preceded both these:

[even] for the tribe of the children of Simeon, according to their
families ;
for though many of their cities had been given by lot to the tribe of Judah, yet it seems as if there were others they had by a special lot cast for them, as many as were sufficient for their families:

and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of
Judah ;
which was done partly because this was but a small tribe, and particularly because the lot put up, which fell to the tribe of Judah, was too large for it, more than they could occupy, too much being put to this lot by the first measurers of the land; and partly to fulfil the prophecy of Jacob, that the Simeonites should be scattered in Jacob, and divided in Israel, (Genesis 49:7); and hence it is that the lots of these two tribes lying together, and being so intermixed, that the tribe of Judah called upon that of Simeon to join them in fighting against the Canaanites, and taking out of their hands the cities that belonged to them, (Judges 1:3) .

And they had in their inheritance Beersheba and Sheba
Or, Beersheba, that is, Sheba; for so the particle "vau" is sometimes used {z}, and must be so used here; or otherwise, instead of thirteen, it will appear that there are fourteen cities, contrary to the account of them, (Joshua 19:6); so Kimchi and Ben Melech make them one city. And it may be observed, that in the enumeration of the cities of Simeon, (1 Chronicles 4:28); Sheba is left out, and only Beersheba is mentioned;

which was a well known place in the farthest border of the land of Israel southward, and the reason of its name is manifest, (Genesis 21:31); (See Gill on Joshua 15:28);

and Moladah ;
another of the cities of Judah, (Joshua 15:26) .

FOOTNOTES:

• F26: Vid. Noldium, p. 280. No. 1200.

And Hazarshual (See Gill on Joshua 15:28);

and Balah, and Azem; of these places (See Gill on Joshua 15:29); for Balah is the same with Baalah there, and with Bilhah (1 Chronicles 4:29) ; and Azem with Ezem there.

And Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah.
] These were all cities of Judah, (Joshua 15:30); Eltolad is the same with Tolad, and Bethul with Bethuel,(1 Chronicles 4:29 1 Chronicles 4:30), and with Chesil, (Joshua 15:30), mentioned there along withHormah; (See Gill on Joshua 15:30).

And Ziklag
Another of the cities of Judah, (See Gill on Joshua 15:31);

and Bethmarcaboth, and Hazarsusah ;
or Hazarsusim, as in (1 Chronicles 4:31) ; the one signifies a chariot house, and the other a court or stable for horses, which made Bochart conjecture ^F1 , that they were places where Solomon kept his chariots and horses;

but it should be observed that these were the names by which these places went in the times of the old Canaanites; and seem to me rather where some of their kings had their horses and chariots; or rather where there were temples dedicated to the horses and chariots of the sun; see (2 Kings 23:11) .

FOOTNOTES:

• F1: Hierozoic. l. 2. c. 9. col. 158.