And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Commentaries

6

A.T. Robertson

A.T. Robertson

A.T.Robertson

19th Century
Southern Baptist
19th Century

That no man should be able to buy or to sell (ινα μη τις δυνητα αγορασα η πωλησα). Final clause with ινα and present middle subjun…

Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes

AlbertBarnes

18th Century
Presbyterian
18th Century

And that no man might buy or sell. That is, this mighty power would claim jurisdiction over the traffic of the world, and endeavor to make…

Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott

CharlesEllicott

19th Century
Anglican
19th Century

And he causeth . . .—Better, And he [that is, probably, the second wild beast, and not the image, as in …

Expositor's Bible Commentary

Expositor's Bible Commentary

Expositor'sBible Commentary

20th Century
20th Century

Those having the “mark” can “buy or sell,” those without it cannot. This statement apparently refers to some sort of socioeconomic sanctions that w…

John Gill

John Gill

JohnGill

17th Century
Reformed Baptist
17th Century

And that no man might buy or sell Either in an ecclesiastical sense, as to, be in any church office, or perform any such …

Matthew Henry

Matthew Henry

MatthewHenry

17th Century
Presbyterian
17th Century

Those who understand the first beast to denote a worldly power also consider the second to be a persecuting and assumed power, which acts under the…

Loading related resources...