Verse of the Day
Author Spotlight
Loading featured author...
Report Issue
See a formatting issue or error?
Let us know →
Verse Takeaways
1
The Moral Inadequacy of Sacrifices
Commentators explain that it's "impossible" for animal blood to remove sin because sin is a moral offense against an infinite God. An animal sacrifice, part of a ceremonial system, lacks the inherent value to satisfy divine justice, repair the broken law, or truly cleanse a person's conscience from guilt. As multiple scholars note, the blood of a mere animal simply cannot atone for a human's moral transgression.
See 3 Verse Takeaways
Book Overview
Hebrews
Author
Audience
Composition
Teaching Highlights
Outline
+ 5 more
See Overview
11
18th Century
Theologian
For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. The reference here is to the sacrifices that were made …
Should take away (αφαιρειν). Present active infinitive of αφαιρεω. Old verb and common in N.T., only here and Ro 11:27 with "sins"…
19th Century
Bishop
This verse explains those that precede. No inconsistency really existed in these sacrifices and this ceremonial system, even though they were so of…
Go ad-free and create your own bookmark library
19th Century
Preacher
But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats shoul…
The yearly ceremonies were ineffective because “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” The word “impossible” (GK 105…
16th Century
Theologian
For it is not possible, etc. He confirms the former sentiment with the same reason which he had presented before, that the blood …
17th Century
Pastor
For it is not possible
There is a necessity of sin being taken away, otherwise it will be remembered; and there will…
17th Century
Minister
The apostle, having shown that the tabernacle and ordinances of the covenant of Sinai were only emblems and types of the gospel, concludes that the…