Scripture Spot Logo

Verse of the Day

WEB

Author Spotlight

Loading featured author...

Report Issue

See a formatting issue or error?

Let us know →

For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins.

Verse Takeaways

1

The Moral Inadequacy of Sacrifices

Commentators explain that it's "impossible" for animal blood to remove sin because sin is a moral offense against an infinite God. An animal sacrifice, part of a ceremonial system, lacks the inherent value to satisfy divine justice, repair the broken law, or truly cleanse a person's conscience from guilt. As multiple scholars note, the blood of a mere animal simply cannot atone for a human's moral transgression.

See 3 Verse Takeaways

Book Overview

Hebrews

Author

Audience

Composition

Teaching Highlights

Outline

+ 5 more

See Overview

Commentaries

11

Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes

On Hebrews 10:4

18th Century

Theologian

For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. The reference here is to the sacrifices that were made …

AT Robertson

AT Robertson

On Hebrews 10:4

Should take away (αφαιρειν). Present active infinitive of αφαιρεω. Old verb and common in N.T., only here and Ro 11:27 with "sins"…

Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott

On Hebrews 10:4

19th Century

Bishop

This verse explains those that precede. No inconsistency really existed in these sacrifices and this ceremonial system, even though they were so of…

Premium

Go Ad-Free

Go ad-free and create your own bookmark library

Charles Spurgeon

Charles Spurgeon

On Hebrews 10:3–4

19th Century

Preacher

But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats shoul…

Expositor's Bible Commentary

Expositor's Bible Commentary

On Hebrews 10:4

The yearly ceremonies were ineffective because “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” The word “impossible” (GK 105…

John Calvin

John Calvin

On Hebrews 10:4

16th Century

Theologian

For it is not possible, etc. He confirms the former sentiment with the same reason which he had presented before, that the blood …

Subscriber

Join Our Newsletter

Get curated content & updates

John Gill

John Gill

On Hebrews 10:4

17th Century

Pastor

For it is not possible
There is a necessity of sin being taken away, otherwise it will be remembered; and there will…

Matthew Henry

Matthew Henry

On Hebrews 10:1–10

17th Century

Minister

The apostle, having shown that the tabernacle and ordinances of the covenant of Sinai were only emblems and types of the gospel, concludes that the…