Verse of the Day
Author Spotlight
Loading featured author...
Report Issue
See a formatting issue or error?
Let us know →
"Should a wise man answer with vain knowledge, And fill himself with the east wind?
Verse Takeaways
1
The 'Windy' Accusation
Eliphaz begins his second speech by rhetorically asking if a wise person would speak with "vain knowledge." Commentators explain this literally means "knowledge of wind," accusing Job's arguments of being empty and unsubstantial. The phrase "east wind" intensifies the insult, as this specific wind was known to be hot, destructive, and unprofitable. Eliphaz is essentially calling Job's defense both worthless and harmful.
See 3 Verse Takeaways
Book Overview
Job
Author
Audience
Composition
Teaching Highlights
Outline
+ 5 more
See Overview
5
18th Century
Presbyterian
Should a wise man - Referring to Job, and to his claims to be esteemed wise (Job 13:2; Job 13:6). The argum…
19th Century
Anglican
Should a wise man utter vain knowledge ... —Job therefore is not wise, and his words have been vain and windy.
17th Century
Reformed Baptist
Should a wise man utter vain knowledge As Job had been thought to be, or as he himself thought he was, which he might say…
Consider supporting our work
Eliphaz begins a second attack on Job, instead of being softened by his complaints. He unjustly charges Job with casting off the fear of God, all r…
13th Century
Catholic
After hearing Job’s response, Eliphaz does not address the depth of his reasoning. Instead, he tries to slanderously misrepresent certain words Job…