Verse of the Day
Author Spotlight
Loading featured author...
Report Issue
See a formatting issue or error?
Let us know →
Verse Takeaways
1
Man-Made Rules, Not God's Law
Commentators stress that the disciples were not breaking God's actual law, as plucking grain to eat was permitted. The Pharisees' accusation was based on their own strict, human traditions which defined plucking as 'reaping' and rubbing the grains as 'threshing'—forms of work they had forbidden on the Sabbath.
See 3 Verse Takeaways
Book Overview
Mark
Author
Audience
Composition
Teaching Highlights
Outline
+ 5 more
See Overview
Commentaries
7
Albert Barnes
On Mark 2:24
18th Century
Theologian
That which is not lawful. That is, that which they considered to be unlawful on the sabbath day. It was made lawful by Moses, wit…
Charles Ellicott
On Mark 2:23–28
19th Century
Bishop
And it came to pass.—See Notes on Matthew 12:1-8.
As they went . . .—More literally, they began to mak…
Charles Spurgeon
On Mark 2:24
19th Century
Preacher
According to some Rabbis, you might pick an ear of wheat on the Sabbath day, but if you rubbed it between your hands, they said that was a sort of …
Go Ad-Free
Go ad-free and create your own bookmark library
Expositor's Bible Commentary
On Mark 2:24
The main point at issue here was not the act of harvesting the heads of grain in fields that did not belong to them. Such activity as Jesus and his…
John Calvin
On Mark 2:24
16th Century
Theologian
Why do they on the Sabbath what is not lawful? The Pharisees did not blame the disciples of Christ for plucking ears of corn from…
John Gill
On Mark 2:24
17th Century
Pastor
And the Pharisees said to him
To Christ, the same they said to his disciples, (Luke 6:2) .
Matthew Henry
On Mark 2:23–28
17th Century
Minister
The sabbath is a sacred and Divine institution; a privilege and benefit, not a task and drudgery. God never designed it to be a burden to us, there…