Scripture Spot Logo

Verse of the Day

WEB

Author Spotlight

Loading featured author...

Report Issue

See a formatting issue or error?

Let us know →

If the thief is found breaking in, and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt of bloodshed for him.

Verse Takeaways

1

Justifiable Self-Defense

Commentators unanimously explain that this law permits a homeowner to use lethal force against a thief breaking in at night without incurring guilt. Scholars like Barnes and Gill highlight that the darkness, the inability to identify the threat, and the reasonable assumption of murderous intent from the intruder made this act justifiable self-defense, not murder.

See 3 Verse Takeaways

Book Overview

Exodus

Author

Audience

Composition

Teaching Highlights

Outline

+ 5 more

See Overview

Commentaries

6

Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes

On Exodus 22:2–4

18th Century

Theologian

If a thief, breaking into a dwelling at night, was killed, the person who killed him did not incur bloodguilt; but if the same occurred in daylight…

Charles Ellicott

Charles Ellicott

On Exodus 22:1–4

19th Century

Bishop

Theft is addressed here with great brevity, with only three kinds being distinguished:

  1. Housebreaking.
  2. Stealing without conver…

John Calvin

John Calvin

On Exodus 22:2

16th Century

Theologian

If a thief be found breaking up. This clause is to be taken separately and is inserted parenthetically. For, after having decreed the puni…

Premium

Go Ad-Free

Go ad-free and create your own bookmark library

John Gill

John Gill

On Exodus 22:2

17th Century

Pastor

If a thief be found breaking up
A house, in order to steal money, jewels, household goods or breaking through any fe…

Matthew Henry

Matthew Henry

On Exodus 22:1–31

17th Century

Minister

The people of God should ever be ready to show mildness and mercy, according to the spirit of these laws. We must answer to God, not only for what …